The rule of law is fundamental to a free society - so why don't NZ courts always uphold it? data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d603f/d603fb31e180820041ac24159fff32c5909bd804" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e63e3/e63e35ee2be14a12b7ae092bb658997fabc1b153" alt=""
Ever since the 17th century, the rule of law has been regarded as one of the fundamental values of a free society. It means you cannot be forced to do something unless there is a law requiring you to do it. It also means people in power can coerce you only if there is a rule justifying it. This is the opposite of the “rule of persons”, in which the rulers have arbitrary power: they have the authority to force you to do things simply because they think those things should be done.
Continued here